Wednesday, May 10, 2006

The Biggest Joke In Crosswords Today

"Look how fast I did the Times Puzzle today! 57 seconds!"

So probably says the kook known as fwongstaal on the New York Times Crossword Puzzles timed applet. Every single damn day.

Guess what? It isn't funny anymore.

And we're going to do something about it.

We made a proposition to the New York Times online contingent at the Stamford tournament two months ago that anyone with what is regarded as a "superhuman" time on the New York Times timed crossword applet should be thrown out of the forums. We'd still like to see that happen, but we have something more intriguing to propose, and we're not so sure how the progress on this is going.

We believe there can be some sort of "cookie" on the site itself or on the user's computer that if a solver opens up the non-times Across Lite version of the puzzle, the solver can not compete on that day's timed applet. We think it's possible to do. And we think, at this point, with the ten or fifteen jerks who think it's a riot to cheat on the applet, it's necessary.

We also think every one of the other good solvers on the applet -- Barry Haldiman, Tyler Hinman, Susan Hoffman, Amy Reynaldo, Byron Walden, and a few others we're too modest to mention -- is appalled that this should keep going on with nothing in place to stop it. We've got to start putting some serious pressure to stop this cheating. Take a look at it this way: the SudokuFun website, which features a new Sudoku game nearly every ten minutes, almost never has cheaters. There is a healthy honor system in place over there, with their moderator James Pitts promising from the start that anyone who cheats by using solving applets would be banned for life from the site. Why can't it be that way at the Times?

This little board of "Today's Best Times" means absolutely nothing when you take into account the dozen or so scurvy little cheaters. So the last part of this is a challenge. Those of you who "do" this puzzle on the timed applet in under two about starting tomorrow, you do the puzzle on the timed applet at 10PM sharp, once it goes up, before you have even seen the puzzle? Then you'll be one of two things: hailed as a superfast solver, or totally humiliated. Better yet, why don't you go to Stamford next year? If you can solve a puzzle in 57 seconds as you claim, fwongstaal, surely you can beat Tyler Hinman. There's an easy $4000 for you right there. And if Tyler wins, it's $4000 of your money he wins. That oughta make it damn interesting.

So the screws are on, you cheaters...and the joke is over. Don't insult the real solvers anymore by cheating.


Orange said...

Eh, the cheaters don't bug me any more. I just scroll down to where the standings actually begin and go on with my life...

Dave said...

Here's a comment left on Amy's blog by mnemonica...

I can't comment at the Mackeys' site because I don't have a blogger account ... but someone should point out to them that Flossie Wong-Staal has done a great deal of good in AIDS/HIV research. I honestly don't know why she (or anyone) would get her jollies speed-typing ... but it seems she does. And anything that helps her relax is fine with me.

The others do annoy me sometimes, but since I've got the door open for the good doctor, I guess I have to let the rest of them in, too.

barrywep said...

I agree with Amy though, not being a supersolver, I thought to hold my fire. Actually the speedtypers may just be having their own competition.Where else can you be competitively timed on line for typing? Filling in the grid in 0:54 is impressive to me even if you have the answers in front of you.

nynynyny said...

A cookie won't do anything. Just do the AL in a different browser or even just clear the cookie. It would have to be a comparison of the IP address kept in the Times' server for comparison.

I think "they" are having a private competition to see who can write the fastest auto-entry application.

Carolina Jessamine said...

The fwong-staal issue is intriguing...if you Google Flossie Wong-Staal, you will discover an eminent scientist...or huge fraud.

I suspect that the person cheating on the xword, using the fwongstaal screen name, has a beef with the real Wong-Staal and is impersonating her to cause her further embarassment as a cheat. Anyone have any insight into this mystery???

James Baker said...

Hello Friend! I just came across your blog and wanted to
drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with
the information you have posted here.
Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!
If you have a moment, please make a visit to my war computer games site.
Good luck in your endeavors!